Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Joe Pernice's avatar

Excellent piece, NC.

Small is the way to go.

I remember after the post-Nirvana indie explosion, after every major label had launched dummy “indie” labels and milked all the “green” from every flannel shirt in sight, bands that persisted began going small. Because they (we) had to. At a certain point in the later 90s (I don’t remember exactly when, but I was there), 30K records sold on a “dummy” indie got you dropped. Such a record made money, just not enough money.

Selling half of that on one’s own label got an artist health insurance for the first time in maybe forever. And that’s not even the best part of it. The best part is when go small. you do whatever the fuck you want. No uptight bean counter from central casting wearing a crisp new Steve McQueen racing jacket, fresh Caesar haircut and still-not-broken-in Vans suggesting your stage wardrobe.

Streaming will try to kill art’s vibrancy. It cares only about engagement. That might not matter to some people. But the people who care will always overturn rocks & logs to see where that noise is coming from.

To quote a close mutual friend of ours regarding sacrificing values to sell records: “Sure, I’ll flick it around a little, but i won’t suck it.”

I love how you drive on, NC.

Expand full comment
Erin O'Regan White's avatar

Yes and yes and yes for smaller, slower, more analog. That's why I love creating art on a letterpress — doesn't get any slower than hand-setting bits of lead spacing between words. Attention being the beginning of devotion, as dear Mary O. once wrote, that work is a contemplative act that doggedly resists the forces that would bow us to AI and the surrender of our creative selves. Fuck the instant-pleasure automated game!

Expand full comment
61 more comments...

No posts